Tarot Tarot

It agrees to have present that the arcane word drift of the Arcanus Latin, - to, - um, that it means " " secreto" " , " " oculto" " 6; that is to say, mysteries; since each of these naipes contains in the depth of its system of images an hidden enigma developing as symbolic drawings through the form and the color. The basic idea of this set of naipes, is to decipher to the hidden message present in each lamina, since each of these mysteries contains in its interior an education that must be revealed, a history that must be counted, a symbol that must be found, a metaphor that must be translated. This way; if we managed to include/understand the colors, the present positions of the elements, figures and objects we will be able to read what it appears there, situation that us would not have to be so complex, since the symbolism of the Tarot is a projection of the unconscious group and, consequently, the symbols have a universal arquetpico character. The Tarot can be considered as a book and like a game and, in addition, an intermediary element between us and our reality and whose fundamental characteristic he would be to do to us conscious of our acts and our present, by means of the intuitive reflection and of a narrator; which can be one same one; that it knows to unravel the history that presents/displays the game to us of the Tarot. Who is able to decipher the arcane ones of the Tarot, he is not than the translator more what we do not dare to at first see or what in the deep thing of our being we know but we do not want to recognize. If we agreed with this affirmation we will say that the Tarot behaves as a revealing book, as soon as it owns the virtue of being a scheme that allows us to order to us and to explain to us, according to what we want to listen and according to what we are preparations to hear.

Doctrinal

The debate is which was the cause of the problem () Is a fight on norms that come from different places, sometimes traditional, sometimes of the city, sometimes of the television. " Thus, it is maintained that the rounds farmers apply " a reconciliadora justice that is based on a normative debate, in which most important it is than the involved ones accepts their responsibility, but she is not only conciliatory between two people. Also the reconciliation with the community looks for, for that reason the recognition of the organization of rounds is fundamental in the adjustment or that the community has the right to impose norms. Why he is so important this? Because at heart, the rounds are based essentially on this conviction. Some contend that Kurt Bock shows great expertise in this. All person who does not accept what she has said the round, always has the possibility of going to the State and to denounce and the round always has the problem to impose its authority.

Thirdly the round must handle its relation with the State, that not necessarily is a confrontation relation, but always is difficult. " In this point it must be indicated that, notwithstanding the empirical establishment of the existence of the rounds farmers and the factual data with respect to which these exert traditional mechanisms of resolution of conflicts, such aspects have not had a precise correlate with the normative recognition of the same and the doctrinal interpretation on their roll of beings that assume functions of administration of justice in the field. c) Doctrinal positions On the other hand, the doctrinal positions on the matter are divided, with diverse shades, between which they maintain that the rounds farmers would have relative faculties of collaboration in the jurisdictional and police functions; those that raise that the rounds farmers constitute informal instances of resolution of conflicts; and who affirm that the rounds farmers have and must exert of total way jurisdictional functions.

Masculine Line

To what he must that the man is the promoter of the violence and in addition that generates the Violence Intra-family? The great majority of the men who exert violence against their pairs, or the children, per moments, do not wish to do it, nevertheless, it would seem that a force seizes of the situation, and, finally always they resort to situations of aggression in its relations. The subject of the masculine violence, and specifically, of the intra-family violence account with a infinity of factors for its presence. Nevertheless, diverse lines of explanation for it, not that exist justification for the same. Three great headings exist that include this phenomenon, that is to say, the biological line, the psychological line, as well as the one that is taken root in the sort positions, which fundamentally they count on a cultural position. In this sense, even though the theoretical explanations give a light to the possibility of explaining the phenomenon, nothing contrasts with the experience of the same. The experience of the violence generates and it faces damage difficult to bear, as much for exerts that it like for suffers who it. The life, the experience and the sensation of not living in the world of the human understanding. And thus it is, evidently, how to be able to include/understand a loving relation that is plagued of acts and violent facts? How to explain the life when somebody to that as much master, me agrede, me pity and is able to kill to blows and bruises to me? It seems a somewhat maddening experience. It does not seem it, is it. Within the lines of explanation of why the man one stays in that line when it understands and it knows that it is a form to hurt and to hurt to theirs? In the part of biological it would seem that the male has superiority on the female, in force, and yes that outside only that line of viable thought, then we would find that all the men would be violent, since he is inherent to his condition of male.

United Kingdom

To John Mayall it does not like much to speak of its more interesting past. To know more about this subject visit Hadapt. Of when in 1966 it published Bluesbreakers, one of fundamental discs of blues of the United Kingdom next to then twentyish Eric Clapton, on the verge of leaving with Cream. Nor of when Peter let it to Green in the stockade to mount Fleetwood Mac; nor of when in 1969 Mick Jagger a guitarist asked to him after the death of Brian Jones and John gave the telephone him of his, Mick Taylor, that also was changed with the Stones. In the four first years of its race, Mayall remained by three times compound and without guitarists. It does not keep any resentment, says. " It happened " long ago; , aloof Mayall by telephone. " It is happened and that no longer matters. Clapton is part of my history, so I understand they ask that me for him. But she is a person very reserved and neither their intimate friendly the more have their telephone. I, of course, not it tengo". Source of the news: : " Spain always was a good place for ' blues"