Rock

Except the fact to need five letters to write! Everything! Simple and absolutely everything! The book folloies history, the proper history of the humanity. The knowledge of the world, the existence of knowing and thinking. It is certain that books existed that are not true, are the pure lie invented for pensantes minds or empty minds. Is thousand and infinite pages in elapsing of the times, fantastic diverse and fragmentos contents: stories, romances, falls, battles, conquest, new and old, counted, told, many times, for as many hands, rational vises and opinions and irrationals, that in the end we do not know the true beginning. The book is the pure fancy, or will be the reality, and what we live it is the fancy? does not know! It affirms only with certainty that would not matter to be a book. To be proper history whenever opened, and to appear as one fnix, to each word deals, in the instant that touched, turned pages, argued, admired and hated, to have the words taken in the wind, to travel the places more far each time. The book is the biggest wealth of the man, unhappyly, prefers to become insane if to deliver to the knowledge, wants the soluble one, the easy one, what it evaporates what is come to ruin, not the concrete, the ephemeral wealth. the rock? It does not forget the rock! The rock folloies history, the proper history of the humanity, the secrets of the world, is thousand and infinite rocks in elapsing of the times, if with the sensitivity of the soul to hear a rock, will see how much of history it contains, what it witnessed: the wars, the battles, the falls, the conquests, the construction, the proper destruction and the birth of everything.

The rock is the fancy of the imaginary one, the solid and strong dreams. Now to be here, tomorrow can cover the desert and to come back again. As something solid, weighed and rude it can fly with does not know! It would not matter of being only one rock. To be immortal, to be the time, life and to create life to the side of counted history, to appear as one fnix when touched, hurled, kicked and destroyed in fragmentos taken in the wind the places each time more far. The book and the Rock would have to be synonymous. In the conception difference between them does not exist, each one adds the same function, the same interest and keeps the same knowledge. To deepen your understanding goldline is the source. Perhaps, it is being ignorant with the thoughts, concluding something improbable nonsense and. However, I love books and the rocks with equal intensity, respect and attention that believes they deserve for everything what lived. Who knows the rock that keeps, is not one breaks up of Tower of the Tumble, or served the weight on the first Holy Writs of Plato!

Viana

Nor therefore all the scholars of the subject if had withheld in studying the violence while relation of being able, domination and/or imposition. For Viana (2004) some of them had taken ways suspicious that had lead to them for ideological interpretations of the subject. Thus, all this inaquality is demonstrated as one of the multiple determination of the urban violence, as affirms (Saints, 2002, P. 5) ' ' the violence is a complex social phenomenon and that it cannot be understood or be explained from only causa' '. Soon the violence for being an increasing phenomenon in all society exists diverse particularizao, therefore the urban violence is only one particular form of the phenomenon violence. But what it becomes it a specific form of violence? For Viana (2002, P. 29) ' ' the urban violence is not the violence that occurs in the urban space and yes the violence derived from the organization of the space urbano' ' , therefore in the cities some types of considered situations occur violent, that could happen in any another way, the agricultural one, for example, and nor therefore would be characteristic as agricultural violence.

Being the violence derived from the organization of the urban space, Viana when analyzing the urban violence considers its relation with the organization of the urban space finds necessary to analyze here the concept of organization of the urban space according to CORRA (1995, P. 28), that it considers the expression equivalent ' ' To the territorial structure, space configuration, space arrangement, space socially produced or simply espao' ' , that is, one ' ' set of objects created by the man and made use the surface of the Land, being a materiality social' ' , in which one is perceived makes a mistake. This notion allows the understanding of the transformations that had occurred up to one definitive historical moment, but, however, it allows the interpretation of a finished space already, what it would annul its historicidade.

Espirito Santo

' But of that day and hour nobody knows, nor the sky angels, but solely my Pai.' ' Mateus 24:36 ' ' You watch, therefore, because you do not know the one that hour has to come your Senhor.' ' Mateus 24:42 is not known when Jesus Christ will come back to create new skies and new lands, but evidences, throughout our day of life, that many espertinhos had said that they knew and ' ' they had broken cara' ' , saying that Jesus would come back in the period of the World War I; others had said that it was in World War II; some had speculated that it would be in year 2.000; it had until who said that Jesus would after come back the fall of the twin towers in U.S.A., but we know that, Biblically, that is pure conserve of less the most informed, is not same! ' ' You look at, you watch and you pray; because you do not know when tempo.' will arrive; ' Landmarks 13:33 the Proper Word of God, who is the Truth, in disclose that this date nor proper Mr. knows it to Jesus, only God-Father to them know to the certainty when it will be this date, although three distinct and separate people make an only one God: the Father, the Son and the Espirito Santo. He gives attention to the acknowledgments of skies how much to the time in return of Jesus. He searchs this! Why he goes to be so fast that he does not go to give time you are welcome, goes to be in one to open and to close of eyes! One makes right of all its sins with God! if was now? Alive as if Jesus it was to come back in this minute: alive certain, part pardon for its sins.

Tarot Tarot

It agrees to have present that the arcane word drift of the Arcanus Latin, - to, - um, that it means " " secreto" " , " " oculto" " 6; that is to say, mysteries; since each of these naipes contains in the depth of its system of images an hidden enigma developing as symbolic drawings through the form and the color. The basic idea of this set of naipes, is to decipher to the hidden message present in each lamina, since each of these mysteries contains in its interior an education that must be revealed, a history that must be counted, a symbol that must be found, a metaphor that must be translated. This way; if we managed to include/understand the colors, the present positions of the elements, figures and objects we will be able to read what it appears there, situation that us would not have to be so complex, since the symbolism of the Tarot is a projection of the unconscious group and, consequently, the symbols have a universal arquetpico character. The Tarot can be considered as a book and like a game and, in addition, an intermediary element between us and our reality and whose fundamental characteristic he would be to do to us conscious of our acts and our present, by means of the intuitive reflection and of a narrator; which can be one same one; that it knows to unravel the history that presents/displays the game to us of the Tarot. Who is able to decipher the arcane ones of the Tarot, he is not than the translator more what we do not dare to at first see or what in the deep thing of our being we know but we do not want to recognize. If we agreed with this affirmation we will say that the Tarot behaves as a revealing book, as soon as it owns the virtue of being a scheme that allows us to order to us and to explain to us, according to what we want to listen and according to what we are preparations to hear.

Doctrinal

The debate is which was the cause of the problem () Is a fight on norms that come from different places, sometimes traditional, sometimes of the city, sometimes of the television. " Thus, it is maintained that the rounds farmers apply " a reconciliadora justice that is based on a normative debate, in which most important it is than the involved ones accepts their responsibility, but she is not only conciliatory between two people. Also the reconciliation with the community looks for, for that reason the recognition of the organization of rounds is fundamental in the adjustment or that the community has the right to impose norms. Why he is so important this? Because at heart, the rounds are based essentially on this conviction. Some contend that Kurt Bock shows great expertise in this. All person who does not accept what she has said the round, always has the possibility of going to the State and to denounce and the round always has the problem to impose its authority.

Thirdly the round must handle its relation with the State, that not necessarily is a confrontation relation, but always is difficult. " In this point it must be indicated that, notwithstanding the empirical establishment of the existence of the rounds farmers and the factual data with respect to which these exert traditional mechanisms of resolution of conflicts, such aspects have not had a precise correlate with the normative recognition of the same and the doctrinal interpretation on their roll of beings that assume functions of administration of justice in the field. c) Doctrinal positions On the other hand, the doctrinal positions on the matter are divided, with diverse shades, between which they maintain that the rounds farmers would have relative faculties of collaboration in the jurisdictional and police functions; those that raise that the rounds farmers constitute informal instances of resolution of conflicts; and who affirm that the rounds farmers have and must exert of total way jurisdictional functions.

Masculine Line

To what he must that the man is the promoter of the violence and in addition that generates the Violence Intra-family? The great majority of the men who exert violence against their pairs, or the children, per moments, do not wish to do it, nevertheless, it would seem that a force seizes of the situation, and, finally always they resort to situations of aggression in its relations. The subject of the masculine violence, and specifically, of the intra-family violence account with a infinity of factors for its presence. Nevertheless, diverse lines of explanation for it, not that exist justification for the same. Three great headings exist that include this phenomenon, that is to say, the biological line, the psychological line, as well as the one that is taken root in the sort positions, which fundamentally they count on a cultural position. In this sense, even though the theoretical explanations give a light to the possibility of explaining the phenomenon, nothing contrasts with the experience of the same. The experience of the violence generates and it faces damage difficult to bear, as much for exerts that it like for suffers who it. The life, the experience and the sensation of not living in the world of the human understanding. And thus it is, evidently, how to be able to include/understand a loving relation that is plagued of acts and violent facts? How to explain the life when somebody to that as much master, me agrede, me pity and is able to kill to blows and bruises to me? It seems a somewhat maddening experience. It does not seem it, is it. Within the lines of explanation of why the man one stays in that line when it understands and it knows that it is a form to hurt and to hurt to theirs? In the part of biological it would seem that the male has superiority on the female, in force, and yes that outside only that line of viable thought, then we would find that all the men would be violent, since he is inherent to his condition of male.

United Kingdom

To John Mayall it does not like much to speak of its more interesting past. To know more about this subject visit Hadapt. Of when in 1966 it published Bluesbreakers, one of fundamental discs of blues of the United Kingdom next to then twentyish Eric Clapton, on the verge of leaving with Cream. Nor of when Peter let it to Green in the stockade to mount Fleetwood Mac; nor of when in 1969 Mick Jagger a guitarist asked to him after the death of Brian Jones and John gave the telephone him of his, Mick Taylor, that also was changed with the Stones. In the four first years of its race, Mayall remained by three times compound and without guitarists. It does not keep any resentment, says. " It happened " long ago; , aloof Mayall by telephone. " It is happened and that no longer matters. Clapton is part of my history, so I understand they ask that me for him. But she is a person very reserved and neither their intimate friendly the more have their telephone. I, of course, not it tengo". Source of the news: : " Spain always was a good place for ' blues"