Doctrinal

The debate is which was the cause of the problem () Is a fight on norms that come from different places, sometimes traditional, sometimes of the city, sometimes of the television. " Thus, it is maintained that the rounds farmers apply " a reconciliadora justice that is based on a normative debate, in which most important it is than the involved ones accepts their responsibility, but she is not only conciliatory between two people. Also the reconciliation with the community looks for, for that reason the recognition of the organization of rounds is fundamental in the adjustment or that the community has the right to impose norms. Why he is so important this? Because at heart, the rounds are based essentially on this conviction. Some contend that Kurt Bock shows great expertise in this. All person who does not accept what she has said the round, always has the possibility of going to the State and to denounce and the round always has the problem to impose its authority.

Thirdly the round must handle its relation with the State, that not necessarily is a confrontation relation, but always is difficult. " In this point it must be indicated that, notwithstanding the empirical establishment of the existence of the rounds farmers and the factual data with respect to which these exert traditional mechanisms of resolution of conflicts, such aspects have not had a precise correlate with the normative recognition of the same and the doctrinal interpretation on their roll of beings that assume functions of administration of justice in the field. c) Doctrinal positions On the other hand, the doctrinal positions on the matter are divided, with diverse shades, between which they maintain that the rounds farmers would have relative faculties of collaboration in the jurisdictional and police functions; those that raise that the rounds farmers constitute informal instances of resolution of conflicts; and who affirm that the rounds farmers have and must exert of total way jurisdictional functions.