Masculine Line

To what he must that the man is the promoter of the violence and in addition that generates the Violence Intra-family? The great majority of the men who exert violence against their pairs, or the children, per moments, do not wish to do it, nevertheless, it would seem that a force seizes of the situation, and, finally always they resort to situations of aggression in its relations. The subject of the masculine violence, and specifically, of the intra-family violence account with a infinity of factors for its presence. Nevertheless, diverse lines of explanation for it, not that exist justification for the same. Three great headings exist that include this phenomenon, that is to say, the biological line, the psychological line, as well as the one that is taken root in the sort positions, which fundamentally they count on a cultural position. In this sense, even though the theoretical explanations give a light to the possibility of explaining the phenomenon, nothing contrasts with the experience of the same. The experience of the violence generates and it faces damage difficult to bear, as much for exerts that it like for suffers who it. The life, the experience and the sensation of not living in the world of the human understanding. And thus it is, evidently, how to be able to include/understand a loving relation that is plagued of acts and violent facts? How to explain the life when somebody to that as much master, me agrede, me pity and is able to kill to blows and bruises to me? It seems a somewhat maddening experience. It does not seem it, is it. Within the lines of explanation of why the man one stays in that line when it understands and it knows that it is a form to hurt and to hurt to theirs? In the part of biological it would seem that the male has superiority on the female, in force, and yes that outside only that line of viable thought, then we would find that all the men would be violent, since he is inherent to his condition of male.