Scientific History

In the field of scientific history, more specifically, engaged in the chain of the autocorrigibilidade of Science we come across ourselves with Thomas Kuhn and with its concepts of paradigm, normal science and scientific revolution, these concepts indicate in them to devir dialtico of the History of Science with the alternation of the scientific communities in prestige to engrandecerem in palco of its specific science, its paradigm or matrix to discipline, as detainer of effectiveness in determined moment of this history, taking it writing its manuals until anomalies appear that they run away its capacity from resolution restoring in its place a new more efficient paradigm, called event scientific revolution. The paradigms, or matrices to discipline, are the fundamental teses of a scientific community, generally, deriving of a scientific revolution restored that them for its effectiveness in deciding problems that escaped of the sphere of the old paradigm that if becomes anomalous. The scientific community more than theoretical liames technician, creates personal bows with its founding paradigm, its reason of being in the scientific field; such bows acquire affective, ontolgicas and ethical connotations, what it becomes the simple possibility of anomaly in this matrix to discipline as something not acceptable and until, that must be prevented by the scientists who compose such community. Normal science if characterizes for the rebuscamento of the paradigm, through the register in scientific manuals of its postulate, as well as of the problems that if find in its sphere being passveis of resolutions in agreement the paradigmtico model. However, the development of normal science, by means of the survey of diverse problems that must be decided in agreement the matrix to discipline e, later must be registered in scientific manuals, approaches the scientists of the threshold of paradigmtico field e, therefore, of the constatao of anomalies in its sphere. The scientific revolution evidences appearing of a new thesis, consisting as new paradigm basing another one scientific community, that decides the questions that extenuaram the possibilities of effectiveness in the resolution of the old scientific community with its looser paradigm.